🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. As time has passed, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Celebration

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform political group is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to declare that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been carried, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to erase Black history and narrative from the records is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the month represents how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at University of Greenwich, put it best when she raised concerns about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not shy away from political issues, and allows opportunity for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.