🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart nuclear negotiations with the United States provided that it is handled with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated exclusively dialogue worked, and revealed fresh requests had come from mediators to restart talks with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is walking a complex route since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out more powerful defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its atomic facilities in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and acrimonious end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations employed their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with US participation could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Officials claimed on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in some form if negotiations restart.

The US president last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, aimed to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the assaults commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and concluded with an absolute demand for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Remains the Ultimate Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always sought to enforce their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be viable and remains the primary answer to address conflicts, but its requirements, rules and principles must be followed."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the identical language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We learned many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to destroy, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have grown more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the government and the country in the wake of this invasion."