🔗 Share this article

Official briefings reveal that government officials enacted a proscription on Palestine Action despite being given warnings that such action could “inadvertently enhance” the group’s visibility, as shown in newly obtained government records.

Background

The assessment report was drafted 90 days ahead of the official proscription of the group, which was established to take direct action intending to stop UK weapons exports to Israel.

The document was written three months ago by officials at the interior ministry and the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, with input from counter-terrorism specialists.

Opinion Polling

Beneath the subheading “How would the banning of the organisation be perceived by British people”, a part of the report warned that a outlawing could become a divisive matter.

The document characterized the network as a “modest specialized group with less traditional press attention” compared to comparable activist organizations such as Just Stop Oil. But it noted that the group’s protests, and detentions of its members, received press coverage.

Officials noted that research suggested “rising dissatisfaction with IDF operations in Gaza”.

Leading up to its key argument, the briefing cited a survey finding that a majority of British citizens thought Israel had exceeded limits in the war in Gaza and that a comparable proportion backed a restriction on military sales.

“These constitute viewpoints around which the organization defines itself, acting purposefully to resist the Israeli weapons trade in the United Kingdom,” officials wrote.

“If that Palestine Action is banned, their profile may inadvertently be boosted, finding support among sympathetic individuals who oppose the UK involvement in the the nation’s military exports.”

Additional Warnings

The advisers noted that the citizens opposed appeals from the rightwing media for strict measures, like a ban.

Additional parts of the briefing referenced surveys indicating the population had a “general lack of awareness” regarding the network.

The document said that “much of the UK population are presumably currently ignorant of Palestine Action and would continue unaware in the event of proscription or, should they learn, would continue generally unconcerned”.

The ban under terrorism laws has sparked protests where numerous people have been detained for displaying placards in the streets declaring “I am against atrocities, I support the network”.

The report, which was a social effects evaluation, noted that a ban under security legislation could heighten Muslim-Jewish frictions and be viewed as government favoritism in toward Israel.

The document cautioned officials and senior officials that outlawing could become “a flashpoint for significant dispute and censure”.

Post-Ban Developments

One leader of the network, commented that the briefing’s predictions had materialized: “Knowledge of the matters and popularity of the group have increased dramatically. The ban has been counterproductive.”

The home secretary at the period, the minister, announced the proscription in last month, immediately after the organization’s activists allegedly committed acts at a military base in the region. Officials stated the harm was significant.

The chronology of the report demonstrates the outlawing was being planned long prior to it was revealed.

Ministers were advised that a proscription might be perceived as an assault on civil liberties, with the advisers saying that certain people in the cabinet as well as the general citizenry may consider the decision as “a creep of terrorism powers into the realm of speech rights and demonstration.”

Official Responses

An interior ministry spokesperson said: “The group has engaged in an increasingly aggressive series entailing vandalism to the nation’s critical defense sites, harassment, and alleged violence. That activity places the safety and security of the population at risk.

“Decisions on outlawing are not taken lightly. Decisions are based on a robust evidence-based system, with assistance from a wide range of advisers from various departments, the law enforcement and the MI5.”

An anti-terror policing spokesperson stated: “Decisions regarding outlawing are a matter for the cabinet.

“Naturally, national security forces, alongside a variety of further organizations, routinely provide material to the Home Office to support their efforts.”

The document also revealed that the Cabinet Office had been funding monthly surveys of public strain associated with the regional situation.