🔗 Share this article

While the existentially challenged Conservative party meets in its conference city for its yearly gathering, it has plenty to consider regarding its path forward. It’s not even clear if a clear direction exists at all. These are challenging circumstances for a political party that now has almost nothing, if anything, fresh or distinctive to say to the electorate.

An Alternate Reality

It could have been so different if tangible progress had been made on an policy focus that resonates with people across the country: Levelling up. Yet the previous administration lacked the basic understanding on how to convert his zeitgeisty rhetoric on social mobility into actual implementation. Over twenty-four months after the 2019 election, it debated what the phrase even meant.

I found it bizarre, because I had previously explained to Johnson what social mobility entailed when we originally talked about it during his leadership campaign. The expression was a term I developed and used at the education ministry to talk about social mobility. It was our guiding principle, and its definition is clear: social mobility is the approach by which we attain equality of opportunity – without removing prospects away from those who are already advantaged, but rather by expanding options to those that don’t.

Fundamental Idea

The other key ministry expression we used, “potential is equally shared throughout the nation, yet chances are not”, represented another a intentional wording, reflecting the dual components of a fairness agenda. Initially, ability distributed uniformly but not nurtured uniformly through our schools and colleges. Furthermore, chances not distributed fairly by the private sector or our economy. Thus, schools and companies were crucial to achieving better life chances. This represented an mission about the social fabric of our country – fostering people’s potential and linking them with opportunities.

The Actual Outcome

What did the social mobility agenda turn into under Johnson’s Conservatives? Local investment schemes overseen from the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities. Decorative floral displays and redeveloped traffic systems. A white paper was published almost thirty-six months after the leadership change, which saw existing policy approaches repackaged under the fresh social mobility slogan.

Consequently, a comprehensive equal opportunity plan went undeveloped, as well as all the change that it may have generated – in investment, commerce, fiscal strategy, taxation and in community development. Additionally, in learning, including a university system that has become a target for politicians of all stripes – despite the fact that it remains the most powerful engine of social mobility for youth from modest backgrounds, including myself, this country has had in recent decades. Maybe the primary source of social mobility, working extensively.

The Importance of Aspiration

Hope is crucial for our country to prosper. For people to have aspiration, there needs to be a believable feeling that hard work and results are related; that if people dream big, they can succeed. For any government, being able to create a sense of optimism about the future is critical. Research by the Institute for Policy Research at the university and others, published last month, showed that the ministry’s focus zones I established during my tenure – locally targeted strategies to improving education outcomes – led to young people in those neighborhoods being up to nearly one-fifth more positive about their life ahead than those in comparable communities without these schemes in place. The research confirms: just making an genuine beginning on fair opportunity strategies can quickly and positively change how people perceive their prospects.

Squandered Chances

Ignoring this evidence, and in the midst of its post-Johnson leadership contest, in that period, the ruling party ended the initiatives. What reason would someone in those communities vote for a organization that made that decision? The opportunity areas policy is a clear case of what had the potential to be a transformative administration strategy on levelling up, but that possibility was hopelessly squandered. Approaches such as this can create belief and drive. In contrast, as the Tories learned, reneging on commitments of fair chances is the most expensive error any government can make. The electorate held accountable the administration for its incompetence but, above all, for its failed pledges on levelling up.

The Current Landscape

Currently the mandate on life chances and equal chances has passed to a Labour government. The previous terminology has been discarded. The current administration has its own public messaging of “eliminating hurdles to advancement”. The organization that is steadily supplanting the struggling incumbents, the challenger, also has its own message – “industrial revival”. It’s a phrase to talk about new opportunities in communities like the one I come from, in South Yorkshire. It suggests that an industrial past can reincarnate into an industrial future.

To the electorate, it must seem like a Groundhog Day-style loop. Similar challenge, different language. However, so far, no progress.

Lessons for the Future

Whether the government and opposition want to prevent the identical outcome, the respective organizations should understand the previous government’s errors on levelling up; that social mobility rhetoric is one thing, but effective implementation of improved opportunities is significantly more difficult. Britain’s endemically weak life chances remains the key issue for our country, with the next generation unable to get a proper professional launch, those putting in effort in full-time jobs with minimal progress after the living expenses are met, and citizens throughout the UK without any actual expectation their offspring will be able to do any better in life than they have.

Politicians can talk about fairer opportunities however much they like. But where is the party that has the complete plan on equal opportunity? None appear to exist. Whoever gets there first, prevails. Not just for their organization, but, significantly, for a entire nation that has desperately requires fair chances so urgently.